C I T A T I O N S & I M P A C T: S C I E N C E
| This page on citation analysis and research impact is for researchers in the Faculty of Science. [Back to Research Support : Science] |
| Citation searching |
|
Web of Science is the multidisciplinary scientific citation database of widest date coverage. You may create alerts to be notified when a specific work or author is subsequently cited. For help with these multidisciplinary databases, contact Michael Parkinson (Subject Librarian: Mathematics, Statistics, & Physics); but for more subject-specific citation resources, ask your Subject Librarian for help.
You may also consult the guide Measuring and Evaluating Science Research (49 kb, 2 pages), prepared by the science subject librarians. |
| How often have YOU been cited? |
| Finding other researchers who have cited your work highlights new authors (even collaborators) of potential interest to you and shows how your research topic is being used elsewhere. Clearly, reviews and citations of your own work are important evidence of your Peer Esteem (PE) and Contribution to the Research Environment (CRE) — see PBRF and Evidence Portfolio for a brief guide, but contact your Subject Librarian for more relevant or personalised help. |
| Comparing journals or researchers |
| Publish your work where it will be seen promptly by other researchers working on the same or closely-related topics. However, when there is a choice between several journals, most authors prefer to publish in the most prestigious one. Various citation-based metrics are used to compare the prestige of journals or the how heavily cited a researcher is. |
| Some journal metrics |
|
|
|
|
WARNING: It is misleading to compare journals based solely on their citation measures. Citation patterns vary across different disciplines and subdisciplines. Even within a single subdiscipline, journals of identical "quality" will have differing impact factors (or article influence, etc) because of differing content: the ratio of "articles" (compared with letters, editorials, etc) and the conceptual nature of those various articles (review articles, methods papers, etc). Although the impact factor is a comparatively transparent and verifiable metric, it is still subject to manipulation and innate inequities. |
| Some researcher metrics |
|
Here is an example of a researcher with an h-index of 21
There are other suggested modifications of the h-index, intended to "compensate" for the number of co-authors, or the time-span since the author first published, or whether the author is still publishing, etc. WARNING: The "same" metric usually varies from database to database (eg, an h-index from Scopus or from Web of Science), because of their different journal coverage, time-periods, or citation verification. PDFs for librarians on ... Finding more citations in Scopus (400 kb, 2 pages) and in WoS (in preparation); Creating a ResearcherID (to be updated). Other introductory material may be found at Research Trends (published by Scopus). For more details on the various metrics, see your Subject Librarian or the contact below. |
Comments and suggestions to: m.parkinson@auckland.ac.nz [Subject Librarian: Mathematics, Statistics, & Physics]. Last updated: 09-Dec-2011 |