|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Contents Journal
impact factors & ranking lists
|
Cited by information
For further information and assistance Please contact your Business Subject Librarian |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal
Impact Factors & Rankings ABDC journal ratings list Australian Business Dean’s Council list. Updated 2010 ABS academic journal quality Guide (UK) The Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) ranked journal list. The Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) initiative assesses research quality within Australia's higher education institutions.One of the indicators used is discipline-specific tiered outlet rankings. Journal Citation Reports: Social Sciences Edition ranks journals by a variety of criteria including impact factor .See also the Library's Journal Citation Reports Helpsheet and A Guide to Using Impact Factors Journal quality list from Harzing.com. Lists are compiled and edited by Dr. Anne-Wil Harzing, The University of Melbourne. The current version contains 20 different rankings of 916 journals. General articles on journal rankings Bergstrom, C. (2007, May).Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. C&R L News, 68(5). Geary, J., Marriott, L., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). Journal rankings in business and management and the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK.British Journal of Management 15(2). Siemens, J.C. , Burton, S. Jensen T & Mendoza, N.A. (2005). An examination of the relationship between research productivity in prestigious business journals and popular press business school rankings. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 467-476 Swanson, E. P. (2004) Publishing in the majors: A Comparison of accounting, finance, management and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 223-255. A recently developed analytical model of the research review process provides theory about the norms used by editors and referees in deciding whether to publish research papers. Swanson, E. P., Wolfe, C. J. & Zardkoohi, A. (2006) Concentration in the major business journals: Evidence and consequences for accounting, finance, management, and marketing The following lists are selective. For a more detailed list of articles on journal rankings and ratings consult the University of Western Ontario libraries Journal rankings in business Ballas, A. & Theoharakis, V. (2003, Winter). Exploring Diversity in Accounting through Faculty Journal Perceptions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 619-644. Beattie, Vivien A. & Goodacre, Alan. (2005, March). A New Method for Ranking Academic Journals in Accounting and Finance. University of Stirling Accounting, Finance and Law Working Paper No. 01/2005 Chan, K. C., Chen, C. R., & Cheng, L. T. W. (2005, February). Ranking
Research Productivity in Accounting for Asia-Pacific Universities.Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 24(1), 47-64.
Glover, S.M. Prawitt, D.F. & Wood , D.A. (2006). Publication Records of Faculty Promoted at the Top 75 Accounting Research Programs
Mathieu, R. & McConomy, B.J. (2003) Productivity in "Top-Ten" Academic Accounting Journals by Researchers at Canadian Universities, Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 2(1), 43-76.
Oltheten, E. Theoharakis, V. & Travlos, N. G. (2005) Faculty Perceptions and Readership Patterns of Finance Journals: A Global View.Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 40(1), 223-239. Prather-Kinsey, J.J. & Rueschhoff,H.G. (2004) An Analysis of International Accounting Research in U.S.- and Non-U.S.-Based Academic Accounting Journals.Journal of International Accounting Research, 3(1), 63-81. Swanson, E. P. (2004, Spring). Publishing in the Majors: A Comparison of Accounting, Finance, Management and Marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 223-255. A recently developed analytical model of the research review process provides theory about the norms used by editors and referees in deciding whether to publish research papers. Bharati, P & Tarasewich, P. (2002). On site: Global perceptions of journals publishing e-commerce research. Communications of the ACM, 45(5). Axarloglou, K., & Theoharakis, V. (2003). Diversity in Economics: An Analysis of Journal Quality Perceptions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1402-1423. Barrett, C.B., Olia, A., & Von Bailey, D. (2000). Subdiscipline-specific journal rankings: whither Applied Economics? Applied Economics, 32(2), 239-252. Coupé, T. (2003, December). Revealed Performances: Worldwide Rankings of Economists and Economics Departments, 1990–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6). Econometrics Journal Online Rankings Kalaitzidakis, P. Mamuneas, T.P., & Stengos, T. (2003). Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6). Keele List of 442 Economics Journals - Keele University, Research Institute for Public Policy and Management Pomfret, R. & Choon Wang, L. (2003). Evaluating The Research Output Of Australian Universities' Economics Departments. Australian Economic Papers, 42(4), 418-441. Entrepreneurship journal rankings Entrepreneurship Journals, includes Financial Times ranking A compilation of MIS Journal Rankings, edited by Carole Saunders and the Senior Scholars' Basket of Journals is maintained by the Association of Information Systems Barnes, S. J. (2005). Assessing the value of IS journals.Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 110-112. Retrieved from Business Source Premier. Fisher, J., Shanks, G., & Lamp, J. (2007). A ranking list for Information Systems journals. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 14,(2), 5-18. Retrieved 25 March 2009 from http://dl.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/469 Hsieh-Hong, H., & Jack Shih-Chieh, H. (2005). An evaluation of publication productivity in Information Systems: 1999 to 2003. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2005(15), 555-564. Retrieved from Business Source Premier. Lowry, P. B., Romans, D. & Curtis, A. (2004). Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of Information Systems journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(2), p29-77, 49p MIS Faculty, Michigan State University. (2008, October). Information Systems journal ranking ("A", "B", "C" journals). Retrieved 25 March 2009 from http://www.cbi.msstate.edu/faculty/shim/ar.htm Rainer, R.K., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM, 48(20), 91-94. Retrieved from Business Source Premier. Willcocks, L., 1, Whitley, E. A., & Avgerou, C. (2008). The ranking of top IS journals: a perspective from the London School of Economics. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 163–168. doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.9 This is one of four opinion papers in this issue devoted to journal ranking lists. DuBois F.L., & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the International Business Journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 689–704. This study seeks to assess and rank the relative quality of 30
international business journals using both a citation analysis and a survey approach.
Inkpen, Andrew C. (2001). A Note on Ranking the International Business Journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1),193-196.
Discusses research by DuBois and Reeb (2000), which examined the relative quality of 30 international business (IB) journals Caligiuri. P. M. (1999). The ranking of scholarly journals in international human resource management International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10 (3).Based on the opinions of experts in the field of international human resource management (IHRM), scholarly journals were nominated and ranked.
McWilliams, A. , Siegel, D. & Van Fleet, D. (2005, April). Scholarly Journals as
Producers of Knowledge: Theory and Empirical Evidence Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 8(2), 185-201. The authors outline a theoretical framework in which an academic journal is considered to be a “producer” of intellectual output. Using the field of
management as an example, the authors specify the inputs and outputs of the production process and estimate the relative efficiency of journals using Data Envelopment Analysis Van Fleet, D. D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. A. (2000). Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Journal Rankings: The Case of Formal Lists, Journal of Management, 26(5), 839-861. This study examines the use of formal rankings of journals by management departments for personnel decision purposes
American Marketing Association. Journal Ranking Literature and Tables. Steward, M., & Lewis, B.. (2010). A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketing Journal Rankings. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), 75. Bakir, A. Vitell, S. J.& Rose, G. M. (2000). Publications in major marketing journals: An analysis of scholars and marketing departments. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 99. The influence of marketing journals : a citation analysis of the discipline and its sub-areas.
Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2000). The influence of marketing journals : a citation analysis of the discipline and its sub-areas. Centre for Economic Research. An important characteristic of journals is how influential they are in the generation and
dissemination of scholarly knowledge in a discipline. We report a citation analysis of 49 marketing and marketing-related journals to assess their relative influence based on the index of structural influence proposed by Salancik (1986). Cheng, L. T. W., Chan, K. C., & Chan, R. Y. K. (2003). Publications in Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Research Productivity of Asia-Pacific Universities.Journal of Marketing Education, 25(2), 163-176. Mort, G. S., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Kiel G., & Soutar, G. N. (2004). Perceptions of Marketing Journals by Senior Academics in Australia and New
Zealand. Australasian Marketing Journal 12(2). Theoharakis, V., & Hirst A. (2002, November). Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspectiveMarketing Letters, 13(4), 389-402. This study seeks to examine the perceptual differences of journals between different segments of marketing academics. It is demonstrated that an individual's geographic origin, research interests
or journal affiliation can have a significant impact on journal rankings Uncles, M.D. (2004). Journal Rankings: How Much Credence Should We Give Them? Australasian
Marketing Journal, 12(2) Kovács, G.,
Spens, K., &
Vellenga, D. B. (2008, August). Academic publishing in the Nordic countries - a survey of logistics and supply chain related journal rankings. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 11(4),313-329. Retrieved from Business Source Premier. Note: Use Find Full Text to locate the article. Olson, J. E. (2005). Top-25-Business-School
Professors Rate Journals in Operations Management and Related Fields.Interfaces, 35(4), 323-338. Retrieved from Business Source Premier. Vastag, G., & Montabon, F. (2002). Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management. Omega, 30(2), 109-126. Retrieved from ScienceDirect database. Hardin, W. G., Liano, K., & Chan, K. C. (2006). Influential journals, institutions and researchers in real estate. Real Estate Economics, 34(3), 457-478. Tu, C., & Worzala, E. (2010). The perceived quality of real estate journals: does your affiliation matter? Property Management, 28(2), 104-121. Improve
your Evidence
Portfolio (EP), by finding citations
of your work that use or review it favourably. This is important for
both peer esteem (PE) and Contribution to the Research Environment (CRE). Page references below are from : Performance-Based Research Fund: Guidelines
2006. (July 2005). Peer Esteem (PE) [...]
Such citations do not need to show agreement with the research findings
but should show that the research is regarded as credible and significant.
Staff members should provide an interpretation of any citation data.(p56). However
a staff member may include examples of contribution to the research
environment from outside the assessment period if such contributions are
outstanding or of particular significance. (p60). Note: avoid duplication of information in the Peer Esteem and Contribution to
the Research Environment fields. The
[peer-review] panel will only consider such information once. (p63). Tip: Research material
before 2000: although
any of your research material published or publicly disseminated prior to
01/01/00 is ineligible as Research Outputs [RO], · Reviews of it, during 2000-2005, are eligible
as peer esteem [PE] · Use of it (e.g., of a “methods” paper
or of software), during 2000-2005, is eligible as evidence of your
contribution to the research environment [CRE]. Who's Citing Me? PBRF Assistance for Business (pdf) Prepared by the Business and Economics Information Services Team in 2010. Focusses on citation indexes and other tools. Key Databases Web
of Science find who has cited a particular article or book. This is
the main database to use. Good for tracking journal article
citations. Use the Create citation alert feature to receive emails
for any subsequent citing of a particular article. Also note the
additional data available for citations eg ranking features, international
spread for citations. Poor coverage of New Zealand journals Google
scholar look for Cited by links for some of the results
Business
Source Premier has Times cited in this database links
for some articles. It also has a Cited references button on the top
of the page menu bar. Note that the 'cited bys' are only to other items in
the EBSCOhost database Scopus is
related to ScienceDirect (same company owns them). It has a clean search
interface and it is easy to find the cited by link to the right side of
each item in a results list ScienceWatch for Data and Rankings (replaces In-cites now archived) - see Economics: High-Impact U.S. Institutions, 2003-07 ; Journals Ranked by Impact: Economics Impact 1981-2006; Impact 2002-06; 2006 Impact Factor. This site focuses on the sciences |
Comments and suggestions to: Margaret Tibbles Last updated: 3 November, 2010 |
